rl← Home

⚠️ DRAFT — NOT LEGAL ADVICE. This document was drafted as a starting point and MUST be reviewed, corrected and approved by a qualified solicitor / data protection specialist before use. It is likely incomplete and may be wrong in places.

rolo — Safeguarding & Children

Draft date: 2026-07-11 · Effective date: [EFFECTIVE DATE]

This notice explains, in plain English, how rolo tries to keep children safe. It is written for parents and carers, and it is honest about what rolo can and cannot do. It sits alongside our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

rolo is a supportive tool, not a safety service, and not an emergency service. If a child is in immediate danger, call 999. If you are worried about a child's safety, contact the right professional or helpline (for example the NSPCC on 0808 800 5000, or Childline on 0800 1111). Do not rely on rolo in an emergency.


1. Our promise: "watched over, never watched"

rolo is built on a simple idea. A child should be able to talk freely to a kind companion and always be safely watched over by a grown-up who loves them — without feeling spied on.

2. How the data is kept safe by design

3. How alerts work

rolo watches for moments when a child may need their grown-up, and sends a same-day alert to the account owner and to any read-only observers.

Alerts are an aid. They may not catch everything, and they are not a substitute for talking with your child and being present in their life.

4. Ending a chat for safety

If a conversation reaches a point where it is not safe or appropriate to continue, the companion may end or pause the chat. When this happens, the grown-up is informed through an alert.

[SAFEGUARDING REVIEW NEEDED: document exactly what triggers a chat being ended for safety, what the child sees when it happens, and how the child is supported in that moment so they do not feel punished or abandoned.]

5. Multiple grown-ups watching over one child

A family can have one owner (full control) and read-only observers (a second parent, grandparent or carer). Observers can read chats and receive alerts but cannot change anything. Inviting an observer means another trusted adult can see the child's chats. The owner is responsible for who they invite.

6. What we tell the child

rolo is designed to be honest with children in age-appropriate, autism-friendly language:

[SAFEGUARDING REVIEW NEEDED: have a child-safeguarding and autism specialist review the exact child-facing wording so it is clear, reassuring and not frightening.]


Open questions for a safeguarding specialist

These are the important questions this draft cannot answer. They need a qualified safeguarding professional (and legal input) before launch.

  1. Escalation policy for serious disclosures. What should happen if a chat surfaces self-harm, suicidal thoughts, abuse, neglect, or exploitation? Who is notified, in what order, how fast, and what does the child see? What is the exact difference between "tell the parent" and "this needs more than the parent"?
  2. Mandatory-reporting posture. Does rolo have, or should it adopt, any duty or policy to report concerns to external authorities (e.g. local authority children's services, the police)? What is rolo's stated position, and how does it interact with the parent being the account holder? [LEGAL REVIEW NEEDED: UK safeguarding-reporting law and best practice for a private service.]
  3. What if the risk is from the parent or an invited observer? The oversight model assumes the watching adult is safe. Design a position for cases where the concern involves the account holder or an observer.
  4. Staff access controls. Who inside rolo can see a child's data or chats, under what circumstances, with what authorisation and logging? What DBS/vetting applies to staff who may access children's data?
  5. Reliability of safety detection. How reliable is the alert / urgent-override / end-chat logic, given it depends partly on AIR's AI? What are the false-negative and false-positive risks, and how are they communicated to parents honestly?
  6. Human review and support. Is there any human in the loop for the most serious signals, or is it fully automated? Should there be?
  7. Record-keeping. What safeguarding records must be kept, for how long, and how do they interact with the right to erasure and the purge receipt?
  8. Alignment with the Children's Code and "Keeping Children Safe in Education" / statutory guidance, to the extent relevant to a consumer service.

This is a non-lawyer draft and not legal or safeguarding advice. It must be reviewed and approved by qualified specialists before use.